THE REVIEW/CRITIQUE DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN EMPHASIZING THE WEAKNESSES OF AN A

The review/critique does not necessarily mean emphasizing the weaknesses of an article but, more importantly, emphasizing its strengths. A good review should include the following:
1. References about the article such as: authors(s), title of article, title of Journal
2. A summary of the paper, written in your own words (do not copy the summary of the article!)
3. A critique of the content (your reaction to the way the article is written, to what the article accomplished or not). You are supposed to judge the adequacy of the method, approach, or arguments and if you are to re-write this article, would you do anything differently?
Below are presented guiding questions for writing your review:
What is the argument/thesis of the article?
How did the author show it?
What methods were employed and how reliable the results of the study are?
What did the author find?